Review: Steak ‘n Shake Western BBQ ‘n Bacon Steakburger | Would I Buy It Again?
Would I Buy It Again?
RSS

Review: Steak ‘n Shake Western BBQ ‘n Bacon Steakburger

Author: indianapoliseater | Filed under: Food Reviews

Steak ‘n Shake
http://www.steaknshake.com

It had been a while since I had eaten a nice, greasy burger and had been even longer since I had been to Steak ‘n Shake, so on a recent Sunday when both of them sounded good to me, I made a trip out for dinner.

I wanted something more than a normal cheeseburger, so I went a bit outside of the box.  Steak ‘n Shake has several different burger options and some of them seem to be blatant rip-offs of signature burgers at other burger joints.  For example, the “Royale Steakburger” is a rip-off of the Royal at Red Robin and the “Wisconsin Buttery Steakburger” is a rip-off of Culver’s ButterBurger.  While what I got is not a direct rip-off, there are several joints that have had this combination for a quite a while before Steak ‘n Shake decided to tackle the challenge.

What I Got:  Western BBQ ‘n Bacon Steakburger combo (comes with fries and a drink; I got it large sized for an additional $0.99); $6.98 + tax.

You can’t tell as well from the picture, but according to the Steak ‘n Shake website, this burger is made up of “A Double Steakburger™ topped with American cheese, hickory smoked bacon, diced and crispy fried onions, then drenched in sweet ’n smoky BBQ sauce.”  Being the regular genius that I am, I can confirm that all of these things were on there, although their usage of the term “drenched” may have been a little generous.  There was barbecue sauce on the burger, but it was far from drenched.

Physical appearances aside, the meat and bun in the burger was pretty much what you’d expect in your standard Steak ‘n Shake offering.  Cooked and flattened on the griddle in their own grease, the hamburger patties were the typical greasy and gluttonous goodness that you’d expect from an old favorite.  Unfortunately, after the burger and the bun, this one started to go downhill.  The bacon was soggy and limp and so were the “crispy” fried onions.  The barbecue sauce, while it did taste nice was not nearly as ample as it needed to be.  Put it this way, this burger needs to be drenched in barbecue sauce in order to make it work with the components that construct it.  In order to get this one to be tolerable, I had to grab some extra sauce and start dipping my burger in it just to add some flavor.  If you need to doctor up a burger outside of the actual preparation of it, you have issues.

Would I Buy It Again?  Western BBQ ‘n Bacon Steakburger, absolutely not.  I will go to Steak ‘n Shake again, but this one will not be a burger that I order.  The sad part is that it has all the components to make a darn fine burger (Ryan at Grub Grade worships Western-syle burgers, so he knows what I’m talking about and would agree that if you do it right, the Western-style burger can be one of the best items on your menu), but Steak ‘n Shake failed on this one.  Too bad.

FYI, the large size drink at Steak ‘n Shake is absurd and comical (picture above).  It clocks in at over eight inches tall!  I didn’t have my graduated cylinder or beaker from my home chemistry set out, but the volume of fluid in the drink had to be every bit of a liter or perhaps even more, especially when you order it with no ice like I do.  It was so much that I only drank half and was able to save the rest to drink at dinner the next night.  LOL.  Unreal.

-IndianapolisEater


Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...

Tags: , , , , , ,

12 Responses to “Review: Steak ‘n Shake Western BBQ ‘n Bacon Steakburger”

  1. Well, now I know what Rod Farva’s talking about in “Super Troopers” when he asks for a liter of cola.

  2. Yeah when the have to reduce the diameter of the cup bottom to fit your cars cup holder its to LARGE. :-)

  3. Nice work here. S&S comes out with a lot of burgers, but I haven;t found anythign to replace the Frisco Melt for my order.

  4. I consider myself a pretty adventurous eater…but one thing I don’t “get” is BBQ sauce on burgers. Ugh!

  5. The Guacamole burger is the best of Steak and Shake’s “fancy” burgers. Double burger with pepperjack cheese, jalapenos and guacamole. Love it.

  6. @Ditz: I’ve actually had that one and wasn’t particularly impressed. Check out my review:

    http://wouldibuyitagain.com/2009/11/review-steak-n-shake-guacamole-double-steakburger/

  7. My favorite for years was “The Philadelphia.” It was a double burger with sauteed onions, sauteed green peppers and melted cheddar (I think) cheese over everything. R.I.P., Philadelphia. (and yes, I know it’s not creative … doesn’t mean it’s not awesome)

    On this one, where are the fried onions? Are they diced? Weird. And unappealing.

  8. Same here, Show. They got rid of that one and put 20 crappy burgers on the menu in it’s place.

  9. @Show: The fried onions are those tiny little brown things on top. Not very good.

  10. Crispy fried onions and diced non-fried raw onions? There’s a simple way to do western bbq style cheeseburgers and that just isn’t it. Hardee’s Western Bacon Thickburger suffered from that too.

  11. Zachary Jacob Zblewski says:
  12. As a Wisconsinite, I gotta say that their Wisconsin Buttery Burger isn’t really a ripoff of Culver’s at all. Culver’s doesn’t put butter on their burgers, and they don’t have one quite like that. Also, Red Robin stole the “Royal/Royale” burger idea from Australia.

  13. The starters, skinny fries, and shakes are really yummy and make you to visit the place again and again.

Leave a Reply